Waiting to Inhale: An exploration into treatment of the growing public health problem Asthma.

 

Written By: John Cooper BBA, CSCS

 

Introduction

 

For the majority of Canadians, nothing in life is as simple as breathing. Breathing is a function of life that most Canadians never have to be concerned with. This integral part of human survival is easy to take for granted, unless of course, you are one of the millions of Canadians that suffer from chronic asthma. Asthma is a serious chronic lung disease affecting over 2 million Canadians (Glaxo Wellcome Inc., 2000). In fact, 10 to 15% of all the children in Canada are affected by this disease (Glaxo Wellcome Inc. 2000). Despite the huge number of people affected by this disease many misconceptions exist with respect to treatment, diagnosis, and management of this potentially fatal disease. This report will look at many of these issues and attempt to provide answers to the following questions:

 

  • What is asthma, and how does it affect those that suffer from it?
  • What are some of the current asthma trends in Canada and the world?

  • What are the current treatments available to the asthma patient?
  • What are the advantages and disadvantages of the various treatments?
  • Which asthma treatments are the most effective for adult chronic asthma sufferers?
  • What are some of the major obstacles associated with asthma therapy and disease management?
  • Can asthmatics live normal healthy lives?

 

Asthma comes in many different forms and affects different people in different ways. Given the huge variety of situations associated with asthma, this report will focus primarily on adult populations with chronic asthma.

 

What is Asthma?

 

According to a comprehensive 1997 study on asthma, conducted by Robert Lemanske Jr. and William Busse, asthma is “a chronic breathing disease of wheezing and shortness of breath, caused by airway obstruction and inflammation” (p. 1855). The inflammation that occurs in asthma can become chronic, which in turn, causes the individual’s lungs to be easily irritated and hypersensitive (Glaxo Wellcome Inc., 2000). Asthma causes the lung airways to contract, swell, and clog up with mucus (Mosby’s Medical Encyclopedia, 1997). Figure 1 outlines the anatomy of the human lungs.

 

Figure 1: Anatomy of the Lungs

Normal lungs prior to an asthma attack are clear and open (see Figure 2). During an asthma attack, the body releases chemicals that cause the muscles surrounding the airways to constrict and narrow, the lining of the airways becomes inflamed or swollen and begins to fill with mucus, further blocking the airway (Figure 3) (Asthma in Canada, 2000).

 


 

Figure 2: Lungs Before an Asthma Attack


 

 


Figure 3: Lungs During an Asthma Attack

 

 

 

The list of asthma triggers is long and growing. According to the Mosby’s Medical Encyclopedia (1997), some of the most common triggers are:

 

  • Certain foods (e.g. chocolate, nuts, eggs, shellfish, milk, oranges, wine, beer)
  • Pollen & mold spores
  • Tobacco smoke
  • Animals dander (e.g. fur, skin flakes, feathers)
  • Dust and dust mites
  • Smog and automobile fumes
  • Cold air, hot air, high humidity, or very dry air
  • Personal care products (e.g. hair spray, cosmetics, perfumes)
  • Aerosol sprays of any kind
  • Changes in weather temperature
  • Respiratory infections and colds
  • Emotions (e.g. anger, fear, crying, laughing too hard, stress)
  • Exercise

 

Asthma also has a strong heredity factor. It is estimated that 75% of children with asthma have a family history of the disorder (Mosby’s Medical Encyclopedia, 1997). With so many potential triggers its no wonder that this chronic lung disease affects so many people.

 

Who is Affected by Asthma?

 

This disease affects any Canadian that contributes to health care in Canada. In 1994, 54,532 people were admitted to hospitals across Canada for the treatment of asthma (Asthma in Canada, 2000). The economic impact of asthma on health care is significant. Consider these alarming facts, as reported by a study conducted by the Angus Reid Research Group in 2000:

 

  • Direct costs associated with asthma in Canada are estimated at $600 million per year.
  • Asthma is the leading cause of absenteeism from school, and the third leading cause of work loss.
  • Asthma is the number one cause of emergency room visits
  • In 1994, the cost of hospitalization in Canada as a result of asthma was $135 million.
  • Worldwide, the economic costs associated with asthma are estimated to exceed the costs associated with tuberculosis, and HIV & Aids combined.

 

What makes these figures even more alarming is that in Canada, the majority of these asthma related expense are preventable, and are primarily due to poorly controlled asthma, with 6 in 10 Canadians not having their asthma adequately controlled (Asthma in Canada, 2000).

 

In Canada alone over 2 million people (6.4% of the adult population) suffer from asthma, and according to the World Health Organization, asthma affects over 100 million people in the world (Asthma in Canada, 2000). The impact of asthma becomes even more alarming with the discovery that its prevalence among adults has been on the rise over the last 20 years. According to a 1998 study by Health Canada, asthma affected 2.3% of adults in 1979, 4.9% of adults in 1988, and in 1994, 6.1% of adults are reported to have the disease. Worldwide, asthma’s prevalence rose approximately 30% from 1980 to 1990 (Mosby’s Medical Encyclopedia, 1997).

 

Figure 4: Increase in Prevalence of Asthma in Canadian Adults

 

 

Although the prevalence of asthma has been on the rise, thankfully the death rate from asthma is on the decline, and has been since 1990 (Canadian Lung Association, 1994). According to the Canadian lung association, there are still approximately 10 asthma deaths per week (1999). The association also reports that on a worldwide basis respiratory diseases are the second largest cause of death and disability among adults, only cancer ranks higher (1999). Unlike cancer however, it is estimated that 80% of asthma deaths could be prevented through administration of proper asthma education (Harrison and Pearson, 1992). According to a 1998 Statistics Canada Health Report:

 

“Despite advances in understanding the disease, and the availability of more efficacious medications, asthma is still a major cause of morbidity. This is often a result of under diagnosis, under treatment, lack of public understanding and knowledge about the disease, and inadequate asthma supervision” (p.24).

 

What Asthma Treatments Are Currently Available?

 

Asthma affects different people in different ways. Some asthmatics experience symptoms primarily because of the development of mucous in the bronchioles, others have symptoms due primarily to smooth muscle spasms surrounding the airways, these symptom are also influenced by what initially triggers the attack (e.g. exercise or allergens) (Lemanske & Busse, 1997). Obviously, if a patient’s asthma is a result of a specific identified allergen, then that allergen should be avoided. However, as the extensive list of triggers identified earlier demonstrates, avoidance is typically unrealistic. It is for these complicated reasons that a variety of treatments are available for today’s asthmatics. Generally speaking, most asthmatics are prescribed two kinds of asthma medicine: one for quick relief and one for long term control (American Family Physician, 2001).  These two types of medication are beginning to become commonly known as ‘relievers’ and ‘controllers (Lemanske & Busse, 1997). Other common terms for relievers and controllers are ‘rescuers’ and ‘preventers’ (Gross & Ponte, 1998). The relievers are used to instantly relive symptoms of an attack and the controllers are used to prevent attacks and increase the patient’s control over their asthma.

 

The long-term controllers are typically taken everyday, and include anti-inflammatory medications such as inhaled corticosteroids, leukotrine receptor antagonist, and combination products (Asthma in Canada, 2000). The relievers are short acting bronchodilators, used to provide instant relief of symptoms such as coughing and wheezing and should only be used as needed (Asthma in Canada, 2000).  A bronchodilator is a drug that relaxes contractions of the bronchioles and relieves bronchoconstriction (Mosby’s Medical Encyclopedia, 1997).

 

The most common asthma medications are (Gross & Ponte, 1998):

 

  • Corticosteroids
  • Cromolyn Sodium & Nedocromil
  • Salmeterol and Extended Release-Albuterol
  • Theophylline
  • Zafirlukast and Zileton (Leukotrines)
  • Short Acting [Beta.sub.2] Agonists

 

With so many options it is no wonder that lack of patient awareness and education is contributing significantly to the poor level of asthma control in Canada (Glaxo Wellcome Inc., 2000). Even though 91% of Canadians believe they have their asthma under control, 57% are considered poorly controlled (Glaxo Wellcome Inc. 2000).  The misuse of medication by patients is a direct result of widespread misunderstandings regarding what the treatments actually do (Glaxo Wellcome Inc. 2000).

 

What Are The Advantages & Disadvantages of the Various Asthma Treatments?

 

Corticosteroids

 

In the June, 2001, Journal of Respiratory diseases, T.H. Horiuchi states that inhaled corticosteroids (IC’s) are the most effective anti-inflammatory agents available for the treatment of asthma.  According to Horiuchi, some of the advantages of IC’s are:

 

  1. Decreased airway inflammation by reducing the number of inflammatory cells
  2. Decreased airway hyperactivity
  3. Improved lung function (Figure 4)
  4. Decreased hospitalization

 

Some of the disadvantages associated with IC’s include (Horiuchi, 2001):

 

  1. Reduced secretion of cortisol from the adrenal gland and a potential reduced adrenal response to stress
  2. Potential adverse effects on bone metabolism, leading to osteoporosis and increased risk of fractures
  3. Decreased sex hormone secretion
  4. Increased renal loss of calcium
  5. Growth suppression in children with long-term treatment
  6. Recognized risk factor for the development of posterior subcapsular cataracts
  7. Thinning of the skin and easy bruising depending on dose levels (>800mcg)
  8. Dysphonia (hoarseness) is the most common side effect, and occurs in about 40% of patients and is reversible when IC’s are discontinued

Figure 4: Corticosteroids and Lung Function

 


 

Despite what appears to be along list of side effects, when used in recommended doses there are minimal adverse effects (Lemanske & Busse).  For long-term use, inhaled steroids are generally preferred over oral steroids because of the decrease in side effects associated with inhaled IC’s (Gross & Ponte, 1998).

 

Cromolyn Sodium & Nedocromil

 

Cromolyn Sodium & Nedocromil are considered very safe agents with mild to moderate anti-inflammatory effects (Gross & Ponte, 1998). These medications are not bronchodilators, but have been shown to inhibit inflammatory cell activation, early and late bronchoconstriction, and airway hyper responsiveness (Lemanske and Busse, 1997). Cromolyn Sodium & Nedocromil are both well tolerated in patients, although side effects such as cough, throat irritation, and unpleasant taste have been reported (Gross & Ponte, 1998).

 

Salmeterol and Extended Release-Albuterol

 

Salmeterol is basically a long acting version of [beta.sub.2] agonist, with a similar mechanism of action and side effect profile (Gross & Ponte, 1998). For detailed information refer to the section on short acting [beta.sub.2] agonists below.

 

Theophylline

 

Theophyline was once considered a mainstay for asthma treatment, but is currently prescribed more as a second or third line agent because of its adverse side effects, and its interactions with many other drugs (Gross & Ponte, 1998). In addition to these problems, serum levels have to be monitored during treatment, which can be extremely inconvenient (Gross & Ponte, 1998). The drugs side effects include (Lemanske and Busse, 1997):

 

  • Intolerable gastrointestinal symptoms (even well within therapeutic drug levels)
  • Potential adverse effects of performance in school for children
  • Slower onset action and a lower peak bronchodilator effect

 

Theophyline is an effective bronchodilator, and can have beneficial effects to allergen induced asthma, improved exercise tolerance, and a steroid sparring effect (Lemanske and Busse, 1997).

 

Leukotrienes Antagonists (a.k.a.: Anti –leukotrienes)

 

Basically leukotrienes contribute to the increased mucus production and subsequent bronchoconstriction associated with asthma attacks (Gross & Ponte, 1998). As the name suggests, anti-leukotrienes reduce the production of the leukotrienes. One of the advantages associated with leukotrienes is the ease of administration (usually taken as a once daily or twice daily oral medication) (Salvi, 2001). Current studies indicate that these drugs are highly effective in patients with aspirin induced asthma and exercise induced asthma, and are recommended for patients that fit those categories (Salvi, 2001). Long-term administration has also lead to reductions in oral and inhaled corticosteroids (Lemanske & Busse, 1997).   Some of the side effects associated with Leukotriene Antagonist include: headache, infection, diarrhea, nausea, dyspepsia, and occasional irritation of asthma symptoms (Gross & Ponte, 1998).

 

Short Acting [Beta.sub.2] Agonists

 

Short acting inhaled [beta.sub.2] agonists are the agents of choice for relieving bronchospasms and preventing exercise induced bronchospasms (Figure 5)(Gross & Ponte, 1998).

Figure 5: Inhaled [Beta.sub.2] Agonists and Lung Function

 


 

The drug’s availability in multiple forms (short, intermediate, and long acting), and multiple delivery systems gives these drugs a huge amount of versatility (Lemanske & Busse, 1997).  The short acting agonists are widely prescribed because of their fast action (i.e. less than five minutes) and longer lasting action (i.e. 3-8 hours) (Gross & Ponte, 1998). Despite the obvious advantages to using short acting [beta.sub.2] agonists, some precautions need to be considered. Some disadvantage associated with the use of these drugs include:

 

  • Several studies suggest that chronic daily usage may lead to worsening asthma control and decreased pulmonary function, particularly in moderate to severe asthma (Gross & Ponte, 1998).
  • Because of the effectiveness of these drugs for short term relief, control over asthma can deteriorate if the asthmatic uses the drugs in exclusion of anti-inflammatory medications (Lemanske & Busse, 1997).

 

Frequent use of these drugs indicated that the asthmatic has poor control over their asthma and signals the need for additional treatment (Lemanske and Busse, 1997). It should also be mentioned that many studies regarding the development of tolerance to these drugs have been inconclusive (Lemanske & Busse, 1997).

 

Which Asthma Treatments are the Most Effective for Adult Chronic Asthma Sufferers?

 

There is no quick answer to this complicated question. The treatment that is most effective for the chronic asthma sufferer depends on several factors. One of the first considerations in making a decision should be to determine the severity of the disease (Lemanske and Busse, 1997). At present, no single test accurately classifies the level of asthma severity; however, the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) has proposed a general classification system, which can be helpful in formulating an asthma management plan (Lemanske & Busse, 1997).  These classifications are: mild intermittent, mild persistent, moderate persistent, and sever persistent. A physician should be consulted to determine where an asthmatic fits in the classification. Asthmatics with persistent asthma require medications that provide long-term control of their disease and medications that can also provide quick relief  (Gross & Ponte, 1998). Research suggests that inhaled corticosteroids are the most effective anti-inflammatory medications available to the chronic asthmatic (Horiuchi, 2001). Horiuchi states that Inhaled corticosteroids are the mainstay of therapy for patients who have persistent symptoms (2001). The huge amount of research available and the various approaches taken by asthma experts, leads one to believe that effective asthma management varies from individual to individual, and that a systematic approach to treatment should be taken. New guidelines from the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program Expert Panel II recommend an aggressive “step care” approach. In this approach, therapy is prescribed at a step higher than the patient’s current level of asthma severity, and is gradually “stepped down” as control is achieved (Gross & Ponte, 1998).

 

What are Some of the Major Obstacles Associated with Asthma Therapy and Disease Management?

 

Despite recent advances in asthma treatment and medications, six in ten Canadians do not have their asthma in control (Glaxo Wellcome Inc., 2000). Canadian asthma sufferers are suffering a lower quality of life then necessary, and the Canadian health care system is bearing a completely unnecessary burden (Glaxo Wellcome Inc., 2000). As previously discussed the majority of the costs associated with asthma hospitalization are completely preventable. According to the Asthma In Canada Study, conducted by the Angus Reid Group, asthma patients and physicians both underestimate the extent to which asthma is out of control in Canada. Despite the fact that Canada falls well short of national standards, both patients and doctors believe that their asthma is well controlled (2000).

 

According to the United Kingdoms National Asthma Campaign, “equipping people with asthma with the tools they need to manage their condition is as important as writing the prescription” (Thoonen and Weel, 2000, p.1482).  One of the major problems with asthma treatment is misunderstanding and/or poor communication with respect to the role that asthma medications play in keeping the disease under control (Phipatanaku and Wood, 1998). Asthmatics are taking IC’s and relievers without an understanding of why they are taking them. Consider these facts uncovered by the Asthma in Canada Survey (2000):

 

  • 50% of patients with poorly controlled asthma are unaware of the role of inhaled corticosteroids
  • One third of patients with poorly controlled asthma do not understand the role of rescue medications
  • One third of patients with poorly controlled asthma use rescue medication daily

 

Another study conducted by the Archives of Internal Medicine found that one in six asthma patients overused inhaled ‘rescuers’ and nearly two thirds underused inhaled corticosteroids (2000).  A Canadian study found that half of the people surveyed with poorly controlled asthma were unaware that inhaled corticosteroids reduced airway inflammation, the underlying cause of asthma (Glaxo Wellcome Inc., 2000). The same study found that 45% mistakenly take an inhaled corticosteroid when having an attack.

 

In addition to poor physician-to-patient communication, other factors that play a role in poor adherence include: prolonged therapy, delayed consequences from non-adherence, expensive and hard to use medications, and concerns regarding side effects (D’Eprio, 1999). One of the considerations of the physician should be to pick the most acceptable medication, considering the poor adherence or potential poor adherence of patients (D’Eprio, 1999). For example, research suggests that children are more likely to take oral medications than inhaled ones (Kelloway, Wyatt, and Adlis, 1994).  Despite the fact that corticosteroids have been highly recommended by experts as offering great potential for asthma treatment, many patients have a steroid-phobia (Kelloway et. al., 1994). It becomes apparent that increased education on behalf of the physician and the patient is needed.

 

Can Asthmatics Live A Normal Healthy Life?

 

Yes. Asthmatics can live a normal, healthy, and long life. Although asthma cannot be cured, it can be well controlled (Glaxo Wellcome Inc., 2000). Asthma care needs to become part of a lifestyle, with proper management asthmatics can be free of symptoms (Glaxo Wellcome Inc., 2000). Despite the fact that 73% of Canadian asthmatics surveyed limit their involvement in sports, this doesn’t have to be the case (Glaxo Wellcome Inc., 2000). Many world class Olympic Athletes suffer from asthma, yet they are able to compete and win at a world class level. Canada’s Karen Furneaux recently competed in the Sydney Olympics 500 meter kayaking event, despite her challenges with asthma (Helgason, 2001). This is just one example of many. One study in the Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology found that at least one in six athletes representing the United States Olympic Team in the 1996 Olympic games had a history of asthma (Helgason, 2001). Although the following criteria may not be achieved by all asthma suffers, they are considered reasonable criteria for treatment (Lemanske & Busse, 1997):

 

  • Minimize or eliminate chronic symptoms including nocturnal symptoms
  • Reduce frequency of attacks, including the need for emergency visits and hospitalizations
  • Minimize the need for acute rescue therapy such as inhaled [bete.sub.2] agonists
  • Establish a normal lifestyle with no limitations on activities including exercise
  • Normalize pulmonary functions
  • Minimize or eliminate adverse effects from medications

 

Conclusions

 

Asthma in Canada is a major problem both socially and economically. Despite the fact that asthma therapies have improved, asthmatic Canadians are living at a lower quality of life then necessary. A huge variety of therapies exist, each with its own unique application. There is an asthma management program out there for everybody. The key is for both the patient and the physician to take the time and responsibility to develop an effective personalized asthma management program. It is up to the physician to educate the patient on the importance of adherence, and on the role of the medications as part of their asthma management program. The old saying “an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure” speaks volumes towards the need for improved treatment of asthma in Canada. Asthma patients limiting their activity as a result of the disease need to be made aware that this is unnecessary. Imagine the economic and social benefits to Canada if control is gained over this entirely manageable disease. Research on asthma treatments, shows that the risks and side effects are minimal, and are easily outweighed by the quality of life gained by freedom from the potentially fatal disease. No one should be handicapped from asthma, let alone die from asthma.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Reference List

American Academy of Family Physicians. (2001). Asthma Medications. American Family Physician, 63, 1212.

 

Archives of Internal Medicine. (2000). Many patients are improperly self-dosing their asthma medications. Geriatrics, 55, 28.

 

Asthma in Canada. (n.d.) Asthma Statistics. In Asthma in Canada. Retrieved October 1, 2001 from the world wide web: http://www.asthmaincanada.com/stats/index.html

 

Asthma in Canada. (n.d.) Background on Asthma. In Asthma in Canada. Retrieved October 1, 2001 from the world wide web: http://www.asthmaincanada.com/backgrnd/index.html

 

Asthma in Canada. (n.d.). Managing Your Asthma. In Asthma in Canada. Retrieved October 1, 2001 from the world wide web: http://www.asthmaincanada.com/manage/index.html

 

Asthma in Canada. (n.d.). Regional & National Finings. In Asthma in Canada. Retrieved October 1, 2001 from the world wide web: http://www.asthmaincanada.com/findings/index.html

 

Canadian Lung Association. “Lung Facts.” 1994 Update.

 

Eprio, P.D. (1999). Improving adherence to asthma medications. Patient Care, 33, 61-71.

 

Glaxo Wellcome Inc. (2000). Asthma in Canada: A Landmark Survey. Retrieved October 1, 2001 from the world wide web: http://www.asthmaincanada.com/report/index.html

 

 

Gross, K.M. & Ponte, C.D. (1998). New strategies in the medical management of asthma. American Family Physician, 58, 89-112.

 

Harrison, B.W.D., & M.G. Pearson. “Audit in acute sever asthma – Who benefits?” Journal of Royal College of Physicians of London, 1992, 27: 387-90.

 

Health Canada (1998). Burden of Asthma and other Chronic Respiratory Diseases in Canada. Health Canada, Health Protection Branch, Respiratory Division – Facts and Figures, 87.

 

Helgason, G. (2001). Olympians win big over asthma. Second Wind. Retrieved October 1, 2001 from the world wide web: http://www.secondwindmagazine.org/issues/2001/winter/feature.html

 

Horiuchi, T.K. (2001). Using inhaled corticosteroids as the mainstay of asthma therapy. Journal of Respiratory Diseases, 22, 358-368.

 

Kelloway, J.S., Wyatt, R.A., & Adlis, S.A. (1994). Comparison of patients’ compliance with prescribed oral and inhaled asthma medications. Archives of Internal Medicine, 154, 1349-1354.

 

Lemnske Jr., R.F., & Busse, W.W. (1997). Asthma: Primer on allergic and immunologic diseases. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 278, 1855-1900.

 

Phatanakul, W. & Wood, R.A. (1998). Perception of the role and potential side effects of inhaled corticosteroids among asthma patients. Chest, 113, 587-592.

 

Sundeep, S.S. (2001). The anti-inflammatory effects of leukotriene-modifying drugs and their use in asthma. Chest, 119, 463-482.

 

The Lung Association. (1999). To nebulize or puff? Second Wind. Retrieved October 1, 2001 from the world wide web: http://www.lung.ca/ca/articles/nebulizersorpuffers.html

 

Thoonen, B. & van Weel, C. (2000). Self management in asthma care. British Medical Journal, 321, 1482-1483.